BuyLow.com Computers And Internet - Internet Security, Computers, Mobile Devices, Networks

BuyLow.com | Resources | Contact Us


 

Microsoft Windows Does Not Disable AutoRun Properly

National Cyber Alert System
Technical Cyber Security Alert TA09-020A
Microsoft Windows Does Not Disable AutoRun Properly
Source: US-CERT

Systems Affected
Microsoft Windows

Overview
Disabling AutoRun on Microsoft Windows systems can help prevent the spread of malicious code. However, Microsoft’s guidelines for disabling AutoRun are not fully effective, which could be considered a vulnerability.

I. Description
Microsoft Windows includes an AutoRun feature, which can automatically run code when removable devices are connected to the computer. AutoRun (and the closely related AutoPlay) can unexpectedly cause arbitrary code execution in the following situations:
A removable device is connected to a computer. This includes, but is not limited to, inserting a CD or DVD, connecting a USB or FireWire device, or mapping a network drive. This connection can result in code execution without any additional user interaction.

A user clicks the drive icon for a removable device in Windows Explorer. Rather than exploring the drive’s contents, this action can cause code execution.

The user selects an option from the AutoPlay dialog that is displayed when a removable device is connected.

Malicious software, such as W32.Downadup, is using AutoRun to spread. Disabling AutoRun, as specified in the CERT/CC Vulnerability Analysis blog, is an effective way of helping to prevent the spread of malicious code.

The Autorun and NoDriveTypeAutorun registry values are both ineffective for fully disabling AutoRun capabilities on Microsoft Windows systems. Setting the Autorun registry value to 0 will not prevent newly connected devices from automatically running code specified in the Autorun.inf file. It will, however, disable Media Change Notification (MCN) messages, which may prevent Windows from detecting when a CD or DVD is changed. According to Microsoft, setting the NoDriveTypeAutorun registry value to 0xFF “disables Autoplay on all types of drives.” Even with this value set, Windows may execute arbitrary code when the user clicks the icon for the device in Windows Explorer.

II. Impact
By placing an Autorun.inf file on a device, an attacker may be able to automatically execute arbitrary code when the device is connected to a Windows system. Code execution may also take place when the user attempts to browse to the software location with Windows Explorer.

III. Solution
Disable AutoRun in Microsoft Windows

To effectively disable AutoRun in Microsoft Windows, import the following registry value:

REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\IniFileMapping\Autorun.inf]
@=”@SYS:DoesNotExist”
To import this value, perform the following steps:

Copy the text
Paste the text into Windows Notepad
Save the file as autorun.reg
Navigate to the file location
Double-click the file to import it into the Windows registry
Microsoft Windows can also cache the AutoRun information from mounted devices in the MountPoints2 registry key. We recommend restarting Windows after making the registry change so that any cached mount points are reinitialized in a way that ignores the Autorun.inf file. Alternatively, the following registry key may be deleted:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\MountPoints2
Once these changes have been made, all of the AutoRun code execution scenarios described above will be mitigated because Windows will no longer parse Autorun.inf files to determine which actions to take. Further details are available in the CERT/CC Vulnerability Analysis blog. Thanks to Nick Brown and Emin Atac for providing the workaround.

Update:

Microsoft has provided support document KB953252, which describes how to correct the problem of NoDriveTypeAutoRun registry value enforcement. After the update is installed, Windows will obey the NoDriveTypeAutorun registry value. Note that this fix has been released via Microsoft Update to Windows Vista and Server 2008 systems as part of the MS08-038 Security Bulletin. Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003 users must install the update manually. Our testing has shown that installing this update and setting the NoDriveTypeAutoRun registry value to 0xFF will disable AutoRun as well as the workaround described above.

118 Responses to “Microsoft Windows Does Not Disable AutoRun Properly”

  1. ??? ????? ????????? ? ??????? ????? ??? ?????????? ????????? ? ??? ?? ????? ? ??????? ????? ???????

  2. ????? ???????? ??????????. ????? ?????? ?????????? ? ???. ????? ????? ????????

  3. ?????? ????????????, ???? ?? ???????

  4. ??????? ????????. ??????? ? ???????????. ???????? ?? ???

  5. ??????????. ?????? ??????? ?????. ???????? ?????????. ??????????

  6. ????????? ? ?????????????, ? ????? ??? ???-?? ?? ???? ?????

  7. ? ?? ??????? ? ????????????????, ????????????? ????????? ???????. ? ??????? ?? – “??????????????? ????”. ?? ??? ??????, ??????? – ??? ???-???? ??????: ??????, ??????, ?????????, ???????????? ????????? ? ??????????. ????? ????? ??????? ?? ????, ?? ??? ?????? – ?? ???? ???????. ????.

  8. ??? ??? ????? ? ?????? ?????. ?? ???????? ?????. ???? ???? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? CD ????????

  9. ???????, ? ? ??? ???? RSS ????? ? ???? ??????

  10. ????? ? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????. ?????????? ??? ??. ????? ?? ????

  11. ?? ??? ???? ???????? ? ????? ?????? ?????. ????????? ,??? ?? ??? ???????????. ????? ????????? ?????? ????

  12. ?? ??? ???? ???????? ? ????? ?????? ?????. ????????? ,??? ?? ??? ???????????. ????? ????????? ?????? ????

  13. ??????? ?? ??????. ????????? ??? ??????

  14. ????? ?????????. ?? ????-?? ?? ???????. ????? ????, ????? ???????? ?????-?????? ???????? ??? ?????

  15. ?? ???????? ?? ???? ?????? ? ????!
    ????, ??? ?????: ???????, ????? – ??? ?????!
    ???? ???? ??????? – ????????? ?????,
    ?? ?? ?????? ????, ???? ???? ???????.

  16. ??????????, ??????? ?? ?????? ;)

  17. ???????? ???? ?? ????, ?? ??? ? ??????? ????? ??????????

  18. ? ?? ??????? ? ????????????????, ????????????? ????????? ???????. ? ??????? ?? – “??????????????? ????”. ?? ??? ??????, ??????? – ??? ???-???? ??????: ??????, ??????, ?????????, ???????????? ????????? ? ??????????. ????? ????? ??????? ?? ????, ?? ??? ?????? – ?? ???? ???????. ????.

  19. ???????? ?? ??? ? ????? 866405474. ???? ???-??? ?? ?????? ???????.

  20. ???????? ???? ?? ????, ?? ??? ? ??????? ????? ??????????

  21. ? ???????????? ???????????? ????, ????? ??????!

  22. ????? ??? ???? ?????? ?????. ?????? ??? ? ???? ??????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ????

  23. ??????? ?? ??????.. ????????? ??? ??????.. ????? ???? ??? ??????????.

  24. ??????? ???: ? ???????? ,? ??????????

  25. ????? ? ??????????????? ?? ????? ?????? …

  26. ?????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??????, ??? ???? ?????? ?? ????????

  27. ??????? ???: ? ???????? ,? ??????????

  28. ???????, ???? ????????????? ??????? ??????? ? ?? ????, ???? ??? ??????????.

  29. ??????? ???: ? ???????? ,? ??????????

  30. ????? ??????! ?????????? ?? RSS, ???? ??????? =)

  31. ?????? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??????, ??? ???? ?????? ?? ????????

  32. ? ?? ?? ???????????? ? ???, ????? ??????????? ??????? ??? ???? ????, ?? ??????? ????? ? ??? ??????? ??????????

  33. ??????? ? ????????. ?????? ???? ?????? ??????!

  34. ????? ??? ???? ?????? ?????. ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ???

  35. ?????? ???????, ??????????? ??? ????????!

  36. ????? ? ??????????????? ?? ????? ?????? …

  37. ?? ????? ? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ? ????????? ?? ?????? ?????. ? ?? ??? ??????.

  38. ???? ????????? ??????????, ????? ????? ????????? ???? ??????

  39. ??????????

    ????-?? ????? ??? ???????? ?? ????? :(

  40. soadvago

    ?? ??? ???? ???????? ? ????? ?????? ?????. ????????? ,??? ?? ??? ???????????. ????? ????????? ?????? ????

  41. Ordedepedy

    ??????? ? ???? ????????. ?????? ???? ??? ??????? ?????? ??????!

  42. Hourge

    ????????? ? ?????????????, ? ????? ??? ???-?? ?? ???? ?????

  43. myncmapy

    ???????? ????, ???????? ????????? ?????? ?? ??? ???? ?????, ??? ??? ???? ?? ????????? ? ?????? ???????, ? ???? ???-?? ????? ?????????????.

  44. JoshuaNe

    ????? ????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????. ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ???

  45. Actual

    ????? ????? ???? ?????????????? ???? ?????? ?????. ??? ?????? ????? ??????? ???

  46. ProstoDok

    ??? ??????? ????????

RSS BugTraq

  • [SECURITY] [DSA 2100-1] New openssl packages fix double free
    Posted by Moritz Muehlenhoff on Aug 30------------------------------------------------------------------------ Debian Security Advisory DSA-2100-1 security () debian org http://www.debian.org/security/ Moritz Muehlenhoff August 30, 2010 http://www.debian.org/security/faq ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Package : opens […]
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] QtWeb Browser version 3.3 build 043 Insecure DLL Hijacking Vulnerability (wintab32.dll)
    Posted by security curmudgeon on Aug 30: 1. OVERVIEW : : The QtWeb Browser application is vulnerable to Insecure DLL Hijacking : Vulnerability. Similar terms that describe this vulnerability have been : come up with Remote Binary Planting, and Insecure DLL : Loading/Injection/Hijacking/Preloading. : 3. VULNERABILITY DESCRIPTION : : The QtWeb Browser applicat […]
  • [ MDVSA-2010:165 ] libHX
    Posted by security on Aug 30 _______________________________________________________________________ Mandriva Linux Security Advisory MDVSA-2010:165 http://www.mandriva.com/security/ _______________________________________________________________________ Package : libHX Date : August 30, 2010 Affected: 2009.0, 2009.1, 2010.0, 2010.1 _________________________ […]
  • {Lostmon - Groups} Safari for windows Invalid SGV text style Webkit.dll DoS
    Posted by Lostmon lords on Aug 30################################################### Safari for windows Invalid SGV text style Webkit.dll DoS Vendor URL:www.apple.com Advisore:http://lostmon.blogspot.com/2010/08/safari-for-windows-invalid-sgv-text.html Vendor notify :Yes exploit available :YES ################################################### Safari browse […]
  • R7-0036: FCKEditor.NET File Upload Code Execution
    Posted by HD Moore on Aug 30R7-0036: FCKEditor.NET File Upload Code Execution August 30, 2010 -- Vulnerability Details: FCKEditor contains a file renaming bug that allows remote code execution. Specifically, it is possible to upload ASP code via the ASP.NET connector  in FCKEditor. The vulnerability requires that the remote server be running IIS. This vulne […]